Mathias Bourgue vs Leo Raquillet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In assessing recent second serve performance, Raquillet has secured 39.16% of points, while Bourgue has outperformed with a 45.41% win rate over the last six months. This statistic often correlates strongly with predicting match outcomes. On analyzing return game performance, Raquillet has achieved a win rate of 38.07% on their opponent's second serve points, contrasted with Bourgue's 43.7%. For first serve returns, Raquillet leads with a 29.33% success rate against Bourgue's 24%. Such data holds high relevance for head-to-head matchup predictions.

Under pressure, both players have identical performance, saving 53.95% of breakpoints when challenged. Broadly, over the past year, Raquillet has secured victories in 51.28% of their matches (W/L 20/19), while Bourgue has marginally surpassed with a 54.24% win ratio (W/L 32/27). Examining surface performance, Raquillet thrives notably on Clay with a 52% win rate (W/L 33/30) but struggles on Hard courts with a 33% success rate (W/L 2/4). Bourgue’s forte also lies on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 264/178), with Grass posing a tougher challenge at 43% (W/L 3/4).

Raquillet has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K in the past year, enjoying a win rate of 54.05% (W/L 20/17), whereas Bourgue shines with a superior 66.67% (W/L 24/12). However, opponent rankings reflect a disparity, as Raquillet has faced players with an average rank of 128.77, much higher than Bourgue's 390.71. If the match extends to a deciding set, both athletes have shown equal prowess, each winning 56% of such sets in the past year, providing an intriguing angle for live match predictions.

Raquillet boasts an impressive 36.62% of breakpoint conversions, a sharp contrast to Bourgue's 22.13%, revealing potential for in-game betting strategies during breakpoint opportunities. Considering all statistical analyses and comparative data, Bourgue is arguably the favorite to win, given their superior recent form in critical areas.